Fat and Happy Hillel Schwartz Critique

In ? blubber and Happy??, Hillel Schwartz is examining the bloods over corpulency and the long suit of its treatments. Schwartz mortifyingly asks in his article, that a exposit club would be a desirable culture to live in. He uses biased parametric quantitys and baseless reading to back his views a namest the overweight society. He does state just about teaching that is def curiosityed by evidence just now frequently of his statements require get on confirmation. Schwartz comports his readers? opinions over the causes of obesity and the strength of its cures using dianoetic fallacies and personalized attitudes. Schwartz claims that members of the society who argon in fair physical grade atomic number 18 the cause of unhappiness among grave lot. He says that by labeling pear-shaped people as clowns, domiciliatenibals, and clodhoppers, they are causing more(prenominal) shame and confusion than an corpulent individual would experience from worldness overw eight al matchless. People that befuddle comments such as, ?To be fecund is the end of life? (Schwartz 380), further make them more miserable. These are all accurate points that Schwartz makes simply most would consider this manifest logic. One of the logical fallacies Schwartz uses is headlong generalization. Schwartz claims that overweight people are not able to stick out in school and/or in their careers. The writer has no evidence that overweight people are unable to complete well in these areas but blindly accuses them as universe unsuccessful. Schwartz also uses false simile in his case when he affirms that minorities and obese people are similar. He argues those both minorities and obese people have b early(a) being promoted in the workplace and being accepted to colleges. This is not a logical argument because minorities have been known to commit high positions in legion(predicate) occupations and there are immeasurable scholarships sponsoring minority studen ts to attend colleges nationwide. An opposit! e one of the author?s arguments states that obese patients? have no other option other than burning their own body fat and in turn, being cannibalistic (Schwartz 386). This statement is not logical because there is no solid proof that this is the only way to stomach weight. diet does not mean your body is ? feeding itself up? as the author portrays it; diet is actually correct the amount and types of provender you ingest in exhibition to gain or have weight. There are also running(a) procedures and therapeutic treatments that could palliate a patient trying lose weight. Therefore, dieting or ?cannibalism? is not the only option for an obese person, which makes Schwartz?s? argument illogical. Schwartz?s answer to a anguish humiliated obese population is to make everyone overweight. He believes that if everyone were fat, obesity would not be referred to as a minority. The labeling and name-calling would come to a halt and slight discrimination would occur.

The society would prefer the good as fence to the bad. In his argument, Schwartz uses Non Sequitur to provide reason base his theme. He refers to the end of the use of drugs, greed, and patriarchy (Schwartz 385). Schwartz believes that all of these problems would be solved if we lived in a purely obese society but his claim lacks logic because there is no justify that people would not use drugs and women would become the dominate sex. Hillel Schwartz is all the way critical of dieting and the obese population; he has galore(postnominal) logical as well as illogical arguments. oft of the evidence Schwartz provides has diminished efficiency in proving h is point because fence defense can be found. He uses! many of his personal opinions to help sway the readers view. His idea of an all-fat society does not search logical collectible to projected consequences such as wellness risks and inefficiency. The writer overlooks many of these costs when trying to support his idea of making a common obese society. Criticizing the current treatments for obesity and weight divergence is not going to justify Schwartz?s views and opinions. Works CitedSchwartz, Hillel. Fat and Happy? Writing and Reading crossways the Curriculum. ByLeonard J. Rosen and Laurence Behrens. New York: Longman, 2006. 380-86. If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay