2019-20 LSAT Test Dates and Registration Deadlines

The LSAT is currently offered seven times per year. Each test is administered on either a Saturday or a Monday, at either 8:30 AM or 12:30 PM. Here is the full schedule for the 2019-20 LSAT test dates, as well as the registration deadlines, score release information, and alternative dates for Sabbath observers. 2019-20 LSAT Dates (North America) You can sign up for the LSAT date of your choice one of two ways: online through your LSAC account, or by phone. You must pay the LSAT fee to complete your registration. Keep in mind that there are earlier deadlines for fee waivers and testing accommodations. Test Date Registration Deadline Saturday, September 21, 2019 at 8:30 AM* August 1, 2019 Monday, October 28, 2019 at 12:30 PM September 10, 2019 Monday, November 25, 2019 at 12:30 PM* October 15, 2019 Monday, January 13, 2020 (check ticket for time) December 3, 2019 Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 8:30 AM January 7, 2020 Monday, March 30, 2020 at 12:30 PM February 11, 2020 Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 8:30 AM March 10, 2020 *A disclosed test is one that will never be administered again. If you take a disclosed test, you will receive extra information with your score report, including a copy of your answer sheet and the scored sections. LSAT Score Releases Starting with the October 2019 exam, LSAT scores will be emailed to test takers within hours of the exam. You can also request to receive mailed scores, which you will receive approximately one month after taking the test. The LSAT score report includes your current score, results from all the LSAT tests you’ve taken (up to 12), an average score, your score band, and your percentile rank. If you took a disclosed test, you will also have access to a copy of your answer sheet, a score conversion table, and a copy of the scored sections that contribute to your score. Your score will also be sent to all law schools for whom you purchased a score report. If you took a paper LSAT and you believe your score is wrong, you can request that your test be hand-scored for a fee of $100. To do so, you must send LSAC a copy of your LSAT Score Report, your name and LSAC account number, and an explanation of the reason for your request. The request must be submitted no later than 40 days after your test date. all be sent no later than 40 days after your test date. If the machine-generated score was incorrect (too low or too high), an updated score will be sent to you and the law school admissions offices. You can cancel your score by 11:59 PM on the sixth calendar day after your test date. If you fail to cancel by the deadline, your score will become part of your permanent record and cannot be canceled for any reason. Canceling your score is irreversible, and there are no refunds. Your law school report will reflect the fact that you canceled your score, and you will not get a copy of your score report. However, if you took a disclosed test, you will still receive a copy of your test questions and the credited answers. LSAT Dates for Saturday Sabbath Observers Some students cannot take the LSAT on a Saturday for religious reasons. If this applies to you, and you want to take the LSAT during one of the months its being administered on a Saturday, you can request to take the test on an alternative day. To do so, you must first register for the regular Saturday LSAT date, then indicate in your registration that you need to take it on an alternative day. In addition, you must also submit a signed letter from your cleric, on official stationery, confirming that you are associated with a religion that observes the Sabbath. The letter can be mailed, faxed, or emailed. It must be received by the registration deadline; otherwise, your registration will be refused and you won’t be able to take the test. Once LSAC receives and approves the letter, they will notify you of your alternative test date through your online account. You can also call to register and request an alternative date by phone (215-968-1001). For 2019-20, the LSAT dates that are open for alternative Sabbath dates are September 2019, February 2020, and April 2020. The alternative date will take place within a week before or after the original test date. Tests administered on an alternative date are administered via pencil and paper, rather than the new digital format.

The Different Types Of Initiation Strategies - 1129 Words

This review of literature examine the different types of initiation strategies implemented among individuals to determine which ones were used across genders and which ones were most successful. More specifically the connection between Sociosexuality and nonverbal behavior and relationship beliefs that determine relationship initiation success. Lastly, it analyzes variables that include the person’s self-esteem and reception received during the initiation. Sociosexuality and Nonverbal Behaviors Individuals sometimes desire commitment and closeness before engaging in sexual intimacy. According to Simpson, Gangestad and Biek (1993), restricted individuals are the ones who require intimacy before sex, where unrestricted are the opposite. In both cases nonverbal behavior were important to relationship initiation, but not as much as those who were classified as restricted (Simpson et al., 1993). They also observed that women scored higher than men for non-verbal behaviors used in initiation. (Simpson et al., 1993). Even though men were almost equally likely to lean forward, laugh, downward gaze, and demonstrate open body posture when initiating nonverbal behaviors (Simpson et al., 1993). As expected, women still managed to depict more intimacy then men did. Findings showed that men and women who vary on unrestricted and restricted traits perform nonverbally in a laboratory setting (Simpson et al., 1993). Similarly, Vannier and O’Sull ivan (2011), who also studied nonverbalShow MoreRelatedPlanning And Execution Of A Strategy Essay1337 Words   |  6 PagesStrategy and Challenges Introduction In modern days we often hear about all different types of strategies, such as military strategy, business strategy, marketing strategy, or government strategy etc. It is widely known that strategy is vitally important to achieve the identified goals for business organizations. This essay briefly discusses the definition of â€Å"strategy† and the challenges that organizations may have during initiation, planning and execution of a strategy. Definition of strategyRead MoreTuberculosis ( Tb ) Is The Disease Of The Lung Caused By A Slow Growing Intracellular Pathogen1252 Words   |  6 Pagesreduce this burden, effective strategies are required in both preventative and therapeutic areas of research. 2.2 Primary infection and host defense in TB 2.2.1 Initiation of innate immunity An individual can be easily infected by exposure to M.tb droplets through an infected cough, once inhaled, these slow-growing bacteria target the resident macrophages of the airway (alveolar macrophages: AM) (4). Although AMs are the first to come to contact with M.tb, other cell types such as dendritic cells (DCs)Read MoreDifferent Ways Nonverbal Communication Is Expressed, Examples Are Expressions, Eye Contact, And Body Language ( Weitz1532 Words   |  7 Pageslimited to verbal exchanges. Each participant of a conversation is presented with verbal responses as well as the unspoken gestures and expressions of the respondent. There are many different ways nonverbal communication is expressed, examples are: facial expression, eye contact, and body language (Weitz). Each type of nonverbal communication is shown through visible aspects which allow the recipient to interpret or decode the message. Nonverbal communication is conveyed in various ways dependingRead MoreMarketing Strategy : A Unique Path For Your Customers Essay1068 Words   |  5 Pages STRATEGY Strategy can be defined in different ways. According to Morley (2014) â€Å"Strategy is the expression of how the company is to achieve its objectives and an expression of its intent to achieve those objectives†. IDEAS IDENTIFIED In COMPETING, business people must point who the competitors are, what they are offering and what their unique selling point is. This will identify the areas you need to compete in, as well as giving you a platform for differentiating yourself. According toRead MoreProject Management Is The Application Of Tools, Skills, Techniques, And Knowledge1690 Words   |  7 PagesBut, project management, formally, emerged as a distinct profession and was officially recognized by the business world during the mid-20th century (PMI, n.d.). Project management includes multiple phases to achieve the required result, which are initiation, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing. Thus, a project manager needs to be a person who is able to efficiently and effectively collaborate every team member of the project to obtain the required result within the timeframeRead MoreDiabetes : A Common Complication Of Pregnancy1345 Words   |  6 PagesThis is also called hyperglycemia. Ther e are three types of diabetes, type 1, type 2 and Gestational diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is usually diagnosed in children and young adults, and was previously known as juvenile diabetes. 5 to 10 out of 100 people who have type 1 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes are formerly called adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, it can develop at any age as well. It most commonly becomes apparent during adulthood. Type 2 diabetes accounts for the vast majority of peopleRead MoreProject : Project Management Life Cycle1221 Words   |  5 PagesProject Life Cycle Project Initiation, Project Planning, Project Execution and Project Termination are the four general areas of the project management life cycle. Before defining the project management life cycle one must first understand what a project is. â€Å"A project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result.† (PMI 2013, p. 3). There are companies and organizations that break down all undertakings to projects; however, it must be identified that althoughRead MoreA Research Study On The American Diabetes Association ( Ada ) Essay1469 Words   |  6 Pagesendocrinologists, internists and nurses). In the qualitative phase, a discussion group reviewed the results of the survey to propose solutions. †¢ Challenges of insulin initiation †¢ To set personalized targets reminding the current targets recommended by guidelines †¢ To recommendHbA1c test every 3months in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes and take action †¢ Patients may benefit from early treatment with basal insulin added to oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) through early glycemic †¢ control (metabolicRead MoreSearch And Seizure : Lesson Plan1069 Words   |  5 PagesTextbook Teacher Made Materials Court Case Worksheet Exit Slip Scenarios worksheet PowerPoint Presentation Fourth Amendment Interpretation Worksheet Technology Chromebook Smartboard Learning Activities (Teaching and Learning Strategies with an Approximate Timeline) Initiation Motivating activity (5-8 Minutes) Students will be given a worksheet in which they will be required to write their own interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. Students will then be asked to turn to their neighbor and share theirRead MoreReflection Of A Project Manager Essay1567 Words   |  7 Pagesimplementing their ideas to plan the project. Fig: Relation between management, team, and use of tools Let us briefly describe their relation using different tools to complete a project with good planning. Project Management: It is responsible for an organization regularly to choose the task and expected they were utilizing some type of undertaking administration. The utilization of gathering instruments and methods to coordinate the utilization of differing assets toward the achievement

The European Middle Ages †Change over Time Free Essays

The economy of the Middle Ages The economy has long been a major force in the development of societies for centuries. It often changes and fluctuates, consequentially resulting in the success or failure of civilizations. The economy of medieval Europe originated as that of a feudal systemdue to the dangerous and chaotic conditions of the continent at the time. We will write a custom essay sample on The European Middle Ages – Change over Time or any similar topic only for you Order Now By the end of the Middle Ages, the feudal system no longer being used due to its newfound inefficiency with the new situations emerging. Towns and trade began to get more popular, but society was still agriculturally based and comparatively less developed than the societies of Asia. The early Middle Ages are characterized by the Church and the feudal and manorial systems; systems in which every European’s life were centered around. In this arrangement there were kings, lords, vassals, knights, peasants and serfs. The hierarchy was that of a property owning basis. It was a land exchange for protection. During early medieval times, Europe was in a state of chaos. Muslim, Magyar, and Viking invaders devastated the continent and surrounded it from all sides. With no true government in place, people were susceptible to invasions, and then came the feudal system. When kings gave men plots of land, those men would have to provide protection for the king and the land given through knights. The system was actually extremely complex because a lord was a vassal and he could also be a knight. In addition to that, a vassal could be a vassal to multiple people and they often fought over land. After the knights were peasants, people who worked the land of their lord. Some peasants were serfs, who were legally bound to the land they were born on, but they were not slaves. The wealth of every lord came from the work of his peasants. The manorial system branched out of the feudal system and was the more economic side of feudalism. The manor was the estate of the lord and there was an agreement between the lord and the peasants who worked the land. In exchange for housing, some farmland, and protection from bandits, the peasants would maintain the estate. A manor was like a small community in the way that is was self-sufficient and had all the necessities for someone living in that time. The manor normally consisted of the lord’s house, a church, workshops, fields, pastures, and a small village for the peasants. The serfs and peasants were also able to produce most of the goods needed for everyday life. The downside of living on the manor, for peasants at least was the taxes. There were taxes on the grain from the lord’s mill, a marriage tax, and a tithe, a church tax, to the village priest. Both of these systems were rigid and social mobility was essentially nonexistent. There was much change in medieval society; some of the causes for these changes even started some domino effects. For example, there was a huge population increase around the 1000s because more efficient farming. Peasants began to rely on horses more than oxen, resulting in a faster plow. The three-field system was also being used, allowing more land to be farmed and more diversity in the medieval diet. Not only was the population increasing, but people were also living longer. Additionally, the worry of being robbed by bandits or invaded by foreigners was gone, so people could now be more independent and could travel without as much fear. Through these factors, there is a growth of towns and the decline of the feudal and manorial systems begins. The expanding towns mainly consisted of peasants and runaway serfs and weren’t as reliant on farming as they were before. This led to other professions reemerging. Local manufacturing was part of town life and the managing of the training of apprentices, the quality of products, and the prices for the goods were all controlled by a guild. Guilds had a monopoly for their trade in their town. Although guilds and towns did help, what truly had a substantial effect on society were wars and diseases. The Crusades, the Bubonic Plague, and the Hundred Years’ War caused a variety of events and eventually led to the end of the Middle Ages. Although it was technically a failed expedition, the Crusades, a series of wars for the reconquering of the holy land fed by religious zeal, had quite a good effect on Europe’s future. After the Crusades, Christians’ relationship with Muslims was severed, but trade routes to Asia opened up everywhere. The trade between the two regions led to new technologies being introduced to Europeans. Furthermore, the power of nobles decreased and the feudal system began to slowly decline over the next 200 years. An example of a flourishing city is Venice that expanded and grew rich. Despite the slightly less unpromising time after the Crusades, the Black Death devastated Europe and made it digress some. The bubonic Plague originated in Asia and had already rampaged through Asia and Africa. Entering Europe in 1347 through a fleet of Genoese merchant ships that arrived in Sicily, the plague spread all throughout Europe quickly. Over one-third of Europe’s population died because of the plague and medieval society was shattered. The population drop led to a scarce amount of workers and increased prices. Farms were abandoned and peasants living in manors demanded higher wages. The nobles refusing to the peasant demands resulted in many revolts. The plague would come in waves, so recovering and surviving more than once was difficult. While the plague struck Europe, England and France were in a war that would come to be known as the Hundred Years’ War. During the war, England used cheaper foot soldiers that used longbows to decimate the French. Knights were being defeated by lowly foot soldiers that were most likely peasants at home, making many people question the functionality of the feudal system. Ultimately the basis of the economy was moving towards trade and the success of towns and cities, ending the system that used to hold medieval society together. Like most past and modern societies, Europe remained dependent on agriculture, the class system was still similar to that of its predecessor, and when compared to other places of the time, Europe isn’t as active in trade and gaining land. A change in economic factors didn’t deviate from the need to feed the growing population. An agricultural based economy was necessary for the survival of Europeans, so that towns could grow and trade could expand. Moreover, the class system still had the king and religious leader on top because of the new sense of nationality and the fact that Europe was primarily Catholic. The class one was born into continued to define the lives of many and social mobility was still nonexistent. Whereas Europe’s trade was beginning to flourish, the trade in Asia and Africa were far beyond that. Just like in the 800s, Europe remained fairly isolated when paralleled to other civilizations. This is partly due to the strong religious intolerance. Namely, the Spanish Reconquista and Inquisition are examples of prejudice against non-Christians, implying a sense of superiority among Christians. The continent was also recently hit with a catastrophic plague, killing one-third of the population, making trade less of a priority. In the 650 years that were the Middle Ages, the economy of the time changed drastically. Europe went from having a strict hierarchy of property owning aristocrats to the growth of merchant-led towns. Nobles lost immense power and the population wavered at the mercy of new agricultural techniques and deadly plagues. Trade became an important component of the European economy, but it still remained very agricultural and not as adept in trade as its peers. The economical change would lead the continent to become on of the principal contributors to history today. How to cite The European Middle Ages – Change over Time, Essay examples

Corporate Governance Failure Marconi Essay Example For Students

Corporate Governance Failure: Marconi Essay An Exploratory Study of Failure in Successful Administrations: The Case Study of Marconi 1. Introduction and Aims There has arguably ne’er been a worse instance of corporate administration failure than Marconi. In October 2005, Marconi accepted a ?1.2bn offer from Sweden’s Ericsson, signalling the terminal of one of the UK’s finest fabrication companies. Over the past six old ages it has been shorn of its telecoms equipment concern and reduced to an vague hindquarters company, called telent, which is non even permitted the self-respect of a capital missive to its name. ( Riley, 2005 ) Marconi was one time, briefly, the most valuable company listed on the London Stock Exchange, under the name General Electric Company, but over the class of 20 old ages it has gone through assorted phases of diminution. Under an bossy head executive, Arnold Weinstock, it attained its greatest power in the late seventiess and early 1980s by working cost-plus, inflation-proofed contracts in telecoms, power technology and defense mechanism: all at that clip in the populace sector. Orders in those conditions were carved up politically. However, the GEC drifted into going a fading pudding stone as the British economic system was privatised and terrestrial time was unable, in contrast to its US near-namesake General Electric, to reinvent itself to accommodate different fortunes. After Arnold Weinstock retired in 1996, it was seized by eager Wheelers and traders, including the controversial corporate moneyman John Mayo, and transformed into a perilously overleveraged telecoms – peculiarly internet equipment – specializer ( Riley, 2005 ) British institutional investors stood by and watched this happen and even encouraged it as taging an betterment on the semi-stagnation of the terminal of the Weinstock period. There followed, after the engineering bubble explosion, as near a coppice with bankruptcy as could be, with stockholders in 2003 losing 99 % of their equity in the restructured company ( Birkinshaw, 2004 ). Even a multi billion dollar debt for equity refinancing could non salvage the concern, and in April 2005 Marconi failed to win even a little piece of BT ‘s ?10bn web upgrade programme. Assorted European and Chinese providers easy underbid Marconi, including Alcatel, Siemens and Ericsson itself, taking to claims that France, Germany and Sweden know something about back uping national title-holders that the UK does non ( Riley, 2005 ). Possibly the afflicted Marconi was no longer up to the occupation when the BT chance appeared, but it besides appeared that the new direction, led by main executive Mike Parton, had been given inappropriate inducement bundles and was unwilling to endure the hurting of the low BT stamp monetary value required. Or possibly the Marconi foremans believed their long-time clients at BT would assist them out for old time’s interest. ( Riley, 2005 ) The group ‘s long-run investors had efficaciously been wiped out and the stockholder list was d ominated by short-run investors, including former bondholders swapped into equity, supplemented by bad purchasers of what was seen as a bad recovery stock. Following the initial clang and debt for equity trade, something of a false morning ensued and, as the company recovered partly after its May 2003 relisting there was a bonanza for directors: 50 of them gained ?28m in fillips, including ?10m for Parton. However, these windfalls were earned largely for refunding debt and merely partially for accomplishing what finally turned out to be a impermanent rise in the portion monetary value. With hindsight it appears that small attending was being paid to the saving of Marconi as a significant independent force in the telecoms fabrication industry, which is frequently what happens when a concern is being run for the benefit of its creditors ( Burkinshaw, 2004 ). It has been claimed that, in world, stock market investors failed to associate to any of the consecutive direction regimes that took the group down the slippery incline from GEC through Marconi to telent: the tyrannizing pudding stone foreman, the foolhardy cowpuncher of the bubble br igade, or the double-or-quit deliverance squad loaded with stock options ( Riley, 2005 ). The diminution of Marconi can be seen as a blunt illustration of what happens when a state like the UK sucks a disproportional sum of its endowment into the fiscal technology sector: the other signifiers of technology: mechanical and electrical, suffer. However, appraising the wreckage following the explosion of the dotcom bubble of 2001, it is easy to overlook the continuity and rapid growing of e-business throughout the planetary economic system. While many high-flying engineering houses, including Beyond.com, Boo.com, and Webvan vanished, and companies trusting on their concern, such as Marconi, suffered to a great extent, usage of the Internet as an indispensable concern tool continued to turn drastically. Indeed, whilst â€Å"pure-play† online grocers Homegrocer and Webvan received tremendous media attending and heavy investing from venture capitalists, today, both are out of concern, while the traditional supermarket concatenation Tesco has emerged as the most successful grocer online. As a consequence, this work intends to carry on a theoretical survey into the factors that make administrations successful, the grounds why antecedently successful administrations go from being successful to neglecting, and the lessons which can be learnt from these administrations. It will so analyze the beginnings, rise to success and ultimate failure of Marconi, in the context of the theory, and looking for countries where Marconi’s failure was in line with theory, in for countries where it was alone. 2. The Success and Failure of Organisations–Theoretical Background 2.1 What Makes for Successful Organisations? Directors crafting a successful concern scheme today face a far more hard undertaking than their forbears. Historically, crafting a scheme centered around three elements: the â€Å"fit† between the company and its industry ( Porter, 1980 ) ; allotment of limited resources among investing chances ( Barney, 1992 ) ; and a sustainable long-run position. These elements created a frame of mention for many directors that, more than anything else, jump them to nearing scheme as if they were traveling to war. Unfortunately, they frequently use the most recent â€Å"war† as their usher to bordering tomorrow ‘s jobs and solutions and, led into this type of war game, directors began to believe that sheer weight and mass could get the better of velocity and legerity. However, resources: the firm’s ‘weight and mass’, entirely no longer can vouch industry leading. During the 1980s the U.S. car industry spent close to $ 100 billion on mechanization, acquisitions, and reconstituting their operations. However, none of the â€Å"Big Three† was able to fulfill client demands for a high-quality, low-priced auto that could fit Nipponese criterions until the early 1990s. Regardless of how much GM, Ford, and Chrysler â€Å"strategically† planned their hereafter investings, their earlier organisational constructions were non geared toward velocity and acquisition. Some of the strategic patterns that hindered big U.S. companies from prosecuting new chances rapidly are those that have besides lead to several companies neglecting to accomplish success. Vertical Integration For most of this century, positions of corporate scheme were shaped by industrialists such as Andrew Carnegie, Jay Gould, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Henry Ford, all of whom believed that perpendicular integrating could vouch beginnings of supply and unafraid purchase on sellers ( Peyrefitte and Golden, 2004 ). Vertical integrating can assist houses construct and protect their competitory advantage when engineering is predictable and markets are stable. The Big Three car shapers at one point vertically integrated into coal and Fe ore mines, steel workss, glass and gum elastic mills, and recognition funding operations to procure stable beginnings of natural stuffs and easy entree to clients. However, perpendicular integrating besides can suppress a house ‘s ability to larn, since it insulates the organisation from market alterations that may redefine its house ‘s nucleus competency. Therefore, perpendicular integrating limits a house ‘s larning possible when engineerings and markets are fast-changing ( Penrose, 1995 ). In the computing machine industry, the most successful houses tend to be slackly integrated, since they need to integrate the newest french friess and constituents from whoever produces them. In contrast, IBM trails its rivals, such as Compaq, Apple, and Dell, partially because its internal operations are geared to a high degree of perpendicular integrating, instead than fast-response to client demands ( Hitt, 1999 ) Unlearning the competitory advantage of perpendicular integrating has been a painful and humbling experience for many of this century ‘s most successful houses. Diversification In the 1950s and 1960s, variegation became the strategic arm of pick. It was popular to interrupt organisations down into decentralised net income centres and handle them as independent SBUs. The rise of pudding stones, such as ITT, Litton, and Textron, mandated that directors adopt new strategic positions to pull off their far-flung and frequently unrelated concerns. In response to this direction demand, the Boston Consulting Group advised top directors to turn up each unit ‘s place based on its market growing rate and comparative market portion. This resulted in concern units being labeled â€Å"cash cattles, † â€Å"stars, † â€Å"question Markss, † and â€Å"dogs.† ( Hambrick and MacMillan, 1982 ) Dogs were clear campaigners for divestiture because they required excessively much hard currency ; nevertheless unluckily, directors frequently found that assuring new inquiry grade countries were loaded with other dangers, as Westinghouse learned. Sing a diminution in the 1980s in the domestic demand for power bring forthing equipment, Westinghouse diversified into office furniture, overseas telegram telecasting, broadcast medium, and fiscal services: all of which came under enormous force per unit area to alter in the 1990s. Simultaneously, Westinghouse sold off its power distribution equipment concern to Asea Brown Boveri, thereby losing the chance to change over a domestic â€Å"dog† into a planetary â€Å"star† by functioning developing countries’ immense, repressed demand for electricity ( Klebnikov, 1991 ). Generic Strategies for Success Low Cost, Differentiation, and Focus Michael Porter developed a generic scheme theoretical account that could be used in a assortment of industries ( Porter, 1980 ) This theoretical account required companies to happen markets they could support from rivals either by going the low-priced manufacturer, distinguishing merchandises in ways that could command higher monetary values and, hence, higher net incomes, or raising entry barriers for new rivals. A low-priced scheme requires a house to stand out at cost decrease and efficiency, which calls for cut downing administrative disbursals, maximising economic systems of graduated table, procuring cheap providers, and minimising gross revenues, advertisement, and service costs. A distinction scheme emphasizes offering a alone merchandise or service, which allows a house to bear down a premium. It frequently relies on extended advertisement or an accent on quality that stresses alone properties that appeal to customers’ typical penchants or trueness. Firms using a dist inction scheme can gain higher net incomes without needfully puting in extremely capital intensive, hard-to-change fabrication procedures. A focal point scheme requires a house to place a defined niche in which it will either offer a alone merchandise or low cost. For illustration, Acura Legend LS, Lexus LS500, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW 735i are targeted to a niche market of American auto purchasers ( Greuner et al, 2000 ). SWOT Analysis SWOT analysis became the cant of the 1980s when Jack Welch used it to measure where GE stood in each of its assorted concerns ( Thompson, 2004 ). The acronym SWOT refers to internal strengths and failings and external chances and menaces. The end of a SWOT analysis is to assist a house place its critical strategic factors and so construct on critical strengths, correct glowering failings, exploit important chances, and avoid disaster-laden menaces. An nonsubjective SWOT analysis can assist organize the initial stairss of constructing a learning-based scheme. Used to oppugn current premises and strategic programs, SWOT analysis can assist directors interrupt free of traditional manners of thought and planning. At GE, SWOT analysis was designed to give directors a platform for rethinking how to vie with other houses. Using SWOT analysis, Welch managed to more than ternary GE’s productiveness growing rate, duplicate the proportion of one-year grosss coming from high-growth engine ering and service sectors, and initiated joint ventures with foreign houses like the Tungsram Company of Hungary ( light bulbs ) and Ericsson of Sweden ( cellular communications ) ( Thompson, 2004 ). However, these conventional market- and competitor-driven attacks to scheme miss the velocity and sensitiveness of the modern market place: low cost, distinction, and focal point are descriptive of schemes that provide directors with checklists to place and â€Å"freeze† market niches and sections. In contrast, modern, frequently learning-based, schemes are designed to â€Å"unfreeze† bing markets to make new 1s in which rapid merchandise development, high-quality fabrication and service, and invention are exploited to their fullest. The undermentioned four schemes have all been designed, and used by companies, to supply sustained competitory advantage and long term success in the modern economic system. Specific Schemes for Success Sustainable Growth In her direction authoritative The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Edith Penrose comes to the decision that growing is indispensable for organisations. ( Penrose, 1995 ) However, organisations that grow excessively quickly push, as a consequence of scarce resources, against their administrative and cognitive boundaries and easy lose control. ( Hambrick and Crozier, 1985 ). An empirical survey by Cyrus Ramezani at the California Polytechnic State University confirmed this theory: uninterrupted growing foremost has a positive consequence on profitableness and company value, but this consequence turns unmistakably negative every bit shortly as an optimal growing value has been exceeded, doing houses slow and unmanageable ( Ramezani et al,2002 ). Firms should therefore restrict their growing to an optimal rate. To what extent growing can be sustained is steadfast particular. Three act uponing factors are peculiarly of import in finding the optimal rate of growing, notably fiscal, marke t, and managerial indexs ( Penrose, 1995 ). The sustainable growing rate from the finance literature provides the first and first indicant of how much growing should be envisioned. The rate of organic market growing in the targeted sections provides a 2nd indicant. Continued growing that is significantly above that of the market can merely be achieved through acquisitions, variegation, or a mix of both. Surveies reveal that both an increasing figure of acquisitions ( Kusewitt, 1985 ) and a high grade of variegation are negatively related to public presentation ( Hitt et al, 1998 ). Inorganic growing should therefore be limited to a manageable degree. How much growing a house can pull off is a 3rd index of both inorganic and entire growing. The internal ability to get by with growing depends on factors such as the organisational construction, the wages mechanisms, and the features of the leading squad ( Hambrick and Crozier, 1985 ). Stable Change Penetrations from scheme research reveal that an organization’s ability to introduce and alter is in-dispensable in dynamic environments. However, inordinate alteration leads to the devastation of an organization’s individuality. Peoples are merely able to move when they have a specific grade of certainty. Organizational controls provide certainty, modus operandis, and wonts. If the alteration exceeds a certain dimension, organisations progressively lose their ability to move ( Nelson and Winter, 1982 ) Organizations hence necessitate a certain grade of both stableness and alteration to last ( Leana and Barry, 2002 ). While certain facets of organisational individualities need to alter, others have to be maintained to supply the necessary security to carry through alteration, and companies therefore need to equilibrate stableness and instability in their individualities in order to maintain the ability to alter quickly, whilst doing certain that the alteration is succes sful ( Gagliardi, 1986 ). Shared Power Surveies from leading research indicate that, although the optimum leading manner in organisations may be dependent on the state of affairs, in the bulk of state of affairss common or shared power use leads to the greatest success. Merely in a few selective crisis state of affairss can an bossy leading manner be an advantage ( Ogbonna and Harris, 2000 ) Empirical surveies have shown that a healthy balance between CEO and board powers is required to guarantee effectual company public presentation and for effectual cheques and balances in corporate administration ( Pearce and Robinson, 1987 ). Healthy Organizational Culture Penetrations from game theory indicate that egocentric competition between employees has less success in the long-run than swearing cooperation. However, in successful big organisations inordinate trustingness may take to an increasing figure of free riders being dragged along. The system so becomes unattractive for high performing artists. Game theory therefore advises the in-between manner of a â€Å"defensible† civilization of trust. An winner can number on being rewarded ; those who do non accomplish can number on being penalized: the tit-for-tat scheme ( Axelrod, 1984 ). Organizational civilization therefore has to strike an optimum balance between competition and cooperation in order to keep a sensible grade of focussed responsiveness to alter ( Abell, 1996 ) Keeping the Balance In general, most successful administrations appear to maintain an optimal balance, in line with the four specific schemes, and based on the two generic 1s. Minor fluctuations around the ideal are, however, wholly normal nevertheless, at a certain point, e.g. during uninterrupted overloading, due to market force per unit areas, the system becomes progressively vulnerable. Successful organisations hence guarantee that they keep the balance in the long term, and don’t overreact in to short term tendencies. Indeed, some of the most systematically successful organisations of the last 20 old ages, among them BMW, General Electric, Siemens, and Toyota, pursued an organisational policy which kept the organisations in balance in the long term ( Abell, 1996 ) 2.2 Why Do Successful Organisations Fail? Directors have been speedy to fault their failure on external conditions such as worsening stock markets or escalating competition. It is surely true that the general market diminution over the past old ages contributed to the failure of so many one time well-thought-of companies. The big figure of failures in the air hose concern and in the telecom industry shows that industry-specific effects such as in-creasing fuel monetary values or technological alterations play an of import function in explicating corporate failure. However, as discussed above, industry effects entirely can non explicate why some companies within these industries failed, while others continued to be successful. For illustration, the telecom giants AT A ; T and Worldcom figure conspicuously on any list of failed companies, while rivals such as SBC Communications and Swisscom remained extremely profitable ( Probst and Raisch, 2005 ) In order to explicate such differences, it is necessary to analyze steadfast sp ecific grounds for failure: factors that house directors can actively act upon. Over the last few old ages it has barely been possible to read a book on direction without meeting four cardinal factors of success: a high growing rate ; the ability to alter continuously ; a extremely airy company leading ; and a success oriented company civilization. However, the great bulk of the failed organisations of the last few old ages possessed these success factors in copiousness, and precisely here lay their job. It seems that there is a boundary exterior of which these success factors have a counterproductive consequence, and antecedently successful companies that fail, frequently owe their failure to at least three of the following four features: inordinate growing ; uncontrolled alteration ; bossy leading ; and an inordinate success civilization ( Maslach, 2001 ). Excessive Growth A immense proportion of the recent TMT company failures followed a stage of enormous company growing. For illustration, the grosss of the energy agent Enron grew at an incredible 2000 per centum between 1997 and 2001 ( Swartz and Watkins, 2003 ). High growing has been related to a figure of restraints and long-run jobs in the literature among which are the managerial restraints on house growing ( Penrose, 1995 ). Aggressive houses are likely to incur managerial jobs and decreased effectivity in their nucleus operations ( Slater, 1980 ). The jobs arise from the deficiency of suited direction to organize the increasing complexness of an organisation during its enlargement. While a few houses do overcome the jobs that high growing engenders, many fail ( Gartner, 1997 ). Second, there are market restraints on house growing ( Penrose, 1995 ), as companies rapidly reach the bounds of organic growing. In order to keep their high growing rates, many failed companies turn progressively toward s acquisitions. For illustration, at ABB there were 60 coup d’etats in two old ages, at WorldCom 75 in three old ages, at Interpublic Group 200 in four old ages, and about 300 in five old ages at the Gallic energy supplier Suez and the pudding stone Tyco swallowed more than 200 companies per twelvemonth at the tallness of its hyperactivity ( Probst and Raisch, 2005 ) However, there is a long history of literature that recognizes the hazards associated with acquisitions ( Sirower, 1997 ) Empirical surveies have shown that the bulk of all acquisitions fail and that in general geting houses experience negative re-turns ( Agrawal et al, 1992 ) Youth Groups As A Discourse Community EssayThe two implicit in direction patterns that have enabled Emerson to implement its best-cost manufacturer scheme are uninterrupted cost decrease ( Mechanical Engineering, 2001 ) and unfastened communicating ( Probst and Raisch, 2005 ). Directors and employees embrace these ideals as pillars that define Emerson’s alone competitory advantage and these patterns, by coercing Emerson to endeavor for of all time higher degrees of betterment, consequence in the company ‘s habitually transcending its old achievements and public presentation. In good times and bad, Emerson has practiced cost-reduction ends at every degree. It requires employees to place specific steps necessary to accomplish these aims and directors to describe every one-fourth on the advancement against these ends. The 2nd rule: unfastened communicating, means that division presidents and works directors meet on a regular basis with all employees to discourse the parti culars of the concern and what the competition is making ( Bernstein and Macias, 2002 ). This creates an unfastened, collaborative civilization, and means that Emerson is ever looking to react to alter, and is ever prepared when alteration arrives. Learning from Failure In larning organisations, failures are looked upon as utile stairss in assisting directors get new experience, penetrations, and knowledge that may be applicable to future merchandises, engineerings, or markets. Although failures may reflect the organisation ‘s initial inability to fulfill a peculiar market or client, they can spur advanced attempts to regenerate and better the organisation ‘s footing of competitory advantage ( Garvin, 1993 ) To larn efficaciously from failures, directors need to see how old trips can interpret into cognition or actions that finally strengthen their house ‘s nucleus competences and competitory advantage. Directors must face the grounds for earlier failures head-on and reply the inquiry, â€Å"How can we use what we learned to future activities? † ( McGill, at Al, 1992 ) The legendary, fabulous Icarus is said to hold flown so near to the Sun that his unreal wax wings melted and he plunged to his decease in the Aegean Sea. His greatest strength, the power of his wings, led to his death. That same paradox can be applied to companies: their triumphs and strengths frequently seduce them into surpluss and neglect that cause their ruin ( Miller, 1990 ). Success leads to specialization and hyperbole, to assurance and complacence, to dogma and ritual. Recently, houses have begun to acknowledge the importance of the nexus between larning from earlier failures and developing future beginnings of competitory advantage ( McGill, at Al, 1992 ). For illustration, diversifying into new merchandises or industries can be dearly-won when direction does non truly understand how to leverage a house ‘s nucleus competence. Kodak’s experiences during the late eightiess and early 1990s provide a instance in point. Kodak is the world’s largest manufacturer of chemical-based movie used in consumer picture taking, medical imagination, and industrial-commercial procedures. The company ‘s strategic purpose is to rule the engineering behind imagination: capturing, entering, reassigning, and heightening images, no affair who the terminal user or client may be. To farther progress its imaging-based nucleus competences, Kodak has spent unbelievable sums on R A ; D, developing leading-edge thermal pressmans, colour use package, and a digital engineering that shops images electronically and translates them into digital informations. Despite Kodak ‘s imaging strengths in the lab, its biggest variegation move in 1988 was the acquisition of Sterling Drug, a pharmaceutical house that appeared to hold legion assuring drugs in the grapevine. Kodak reasoned that, with its extended cognition of chemical-based lab processes, it would immediately go a formidable participant in the profitable ph armaceutical industry. Because Kodak ‘s blood analyser, diagnostic equipment, chemical substrates, and movie merchandises were already widely used in medical research labs, its directors thought that Sterling would supply them with an easy entry into a new industry that would non confront the same sort of intense competitory force per unit areas qualifying the photographic movie industry ( Jaffe, 1989 ). These outlooks ne’er materialized, nevertheless. Kodak found few existent chances to leverage and portion its industrial, film-driven, chemical research lab processes with pharmaceutical merchandise development. Competitive advantage and success in the pharmaceutical industry depended more on basic lab research that involved molecules, proteins and saccharides, while Kodak ‘s labs had deeper, more applied experience with organic chemical science, polymers, and enzymes. The ability to leverage engineerings used in movies and imaging did non suit good with the accomplishments required for smooth integrating and command of the pharmaceutical industry ( Hammonds, 1989 ). Kodak finally placed a major portion of its Sterling Drug acquisition into a joint venture with Gallic pharmaceutical giant Sanofi. In July 1994, Kodak sold its part of the pharmaceutical joint venture to Sanofi ( Hammonds, 1994 ). Kodak ‘s most recent moves appear more promising. Rather than seeking external variegation chances, it has refocused its attempts on constructing a strong presence in new digital-imaging engineerings Now wary of how peripheral concerns can deflect the company from its nucleus imagination concerns, Kodak is puting in new merchandises and making strategic confederations that extend and regenerate its imaging-based competences ( Tauhert, 1997 ). Even though progresss in digital imagination may finally displace gross revenues of Kodak movie and development paper over the class of this century, the company appears committed to larning and using new accomplishments and techniques to play a prima function in the emerging multimedia industry. The Learning Organisation By the terminal of the 1990s, â€Å"the larning organization† and the construct of â€Å"organizational learning† had become indispensable nucleus thoughts for directors, advisers and research workers looking to do guarantee continued success for an administration. For any concern or organisation, the ability to larn better and faster than its rivals is an indispensable nucleus competence. A learning organisation can be recognized from the outside by its legerity in altering how it relates to the external universe and how it conducts its internal operations ( Marquardt, 2002 ) It can be recognized from the interior by an ethos in which larning from challenges and errors is cardinal ( Lytras et al, 2005 ) While successful consequences are really of import to larning organisations: typically they set really high criterions, they recognize that frequently success is merely achieved after initial errors, and what people learn from those early errors is frequently the key to eventual success. Peoples must larn from everyone’s errors, non merely their ain, as it is excessively dearly-won to hold people reiterating errors that have already been made by others ( Lytras et al, 2005 ). A narrative from IBM Corp. Tells of a really disquieted director traveling in to see his foreman right after the failure of the large invention undertaking he had headed. Wasting no clip, he said, â€Å"I suppose you ‘re traveling to fire me.† â€Å"Why should I make that, † replied the foreman, â€Å"when I ‘ve merely invested $ 6 million in your instruction? † ( Sugarman, 2001 ) That tale reflects several ways of thought that are characteristic of a learning organisation: of import larning comes from errors, one time they have been decently analyzed ; this signifier of acquisition is at least every bit of import as formal preparation ; and a company must take good attention of the people who develop this cognition. A learning organisation is good at two sorts of acquisition: good at making new solutions, and good at sharing cognition with other members who may necessitate it. So there must be openness to new thoughts, wherever they come from, and to sharing cognition for the good of the concern. It becomes of import to put aside the embarrassment over sharing one’s errors and the reluctance to inquire for aid or to borrow person else ‘s solution. It is non merely single attitudes that have to alter, though ; it is besides the policies and forms of direction behavior ( Lytras et al, 2005 ). When employees can swear that their foremans will non punish them for uncovering errors or for seeking aid with a hard job, so there will be more organisational acquisition and better solutions to be shared. The ends for a successful learning-based alteration enterprise are normally double: they focus on betterment in specific, short-run concern consequences through doing major betterments in the work processes and interpersonal relationships at the workplace. Because of these ends, â€Å"work† includes certain sorts of â€Å"learning.† In most instances, a cardinal function in explicating these dual-focus ends, and in negociating the scheme is played by a â€Å"core acquisition squad, † a brooding leading group of partisans who initiate the alteration procedure. This learning-based alteration procedure depends upon alteration bubbling up from the nucleus of the organisation, instead than on a plan cascading down from the top ( Lytras et al, 2005 ). The top executives of many successful companies are among the alteration leaders in their plans or units, and this takes topographic point under their enterprise, non their boss’s. They are voluntaries, non under orders to take alteration and, in showing it to their followings ; they seek voluntaries who want to go engaged in the enterprise ( Lytras et al, 2005 ). As such, the learning-based attack introduces into the workplace ways of thought and behaving that are significantly different from what has been ingrained by over a hundred old ages of the old in dustrial tradition ( Marquardt, 2002 ) The new economic system demands a new sort of organisation, based on new ways of thought. For an established company to do such a alteration is a immense achievement: even in merely one section of the whole, but the wagess can be huge. 3. The Marconi Case 3.1 Marconi: a Brief History General Electric Company ( GEC ) grew quickly in the 1960s under Arnold Weinstock’s tyrannizing but effectual leading. ( The Economist, 1995 ) Like its American opposite number, General Electric, GEC grew into a pudding stone with involvements in such diverse concerns as white goods, defense mechanism electronics, telecoms and power systems. While there was no existent logic underlying this array of concerns, Weinstock held the company together through a combination of his enforcing personality and a rigorous system of fiscal controls, and at its extremum GEC had gross revenues ?11bn, a hard currency heap of ?2bn and was the most valuable company in the UK FTSE ( Fildes, 1996 ). Lord Weinstock retired in 1996 and was replaced by George Simpson, a former executive at Rover. Over the class of the following five old ages, Simpson and his finance manager John Mayo masterminded a complete rethinking GEC’s corporate scheme. They decided to concentrate the company strongly on the aggressive telecoms equipment industry. Simpson bought two mid-sized US rivals for big amounts of money: Reltec for $ 2.1bn and Fore for $ 4.5bn, and invested in developing a scope of new merchandises to vie with industry leaders Cisco and Nortel ( Sheffler, 1999 ) To pay for this growing, most other concerns, including defense mechanism electronics, white goods and power systems were sold away. To reflect this alteration of scheme, GEC was renamed Marconi. Marconi, as a telecoms-equipment shaper, was ne’er an ordinary company. Initially, it was renowned as one of Britain ‘s modern concern success narratives, the transmutation of sulky, unstylish GEC into slick, advance d Marconi. 3.2 Problems Start On the dorsum of the dot com roar, Marconi’s portion monetary value peaked in August 2000 at ?12. Then things started to travel severely incorrectly, as the dot com bubble explosion, and demand for new telecoms equipment dried up. Lucent, Cisco and Nortel all announced net income warnings and Marconi’s portion monetary value dropped even though it denied that its gross revenues had been hit. Marconi stood as the Teflon of the European equipment infinite until July 2001 when it cut in half its net income prognosis for this twelvemonth and cut 4,000 occupations ( Omatseye, 2001 ). This took investors by storm and sent its stock into a sudden plumb bob, as angry investors dumped the stock. Chief Executive George Simpson acknowledged that his company was vulnerable for a coup d’etat, although he said â€Å"there are no negotiations with rivals at the present time.† He noted that with the company ‘s portion monetary value now low, â€Å"I know we are vulnerable.† ( Omatseye, 2001 ) Industry guesss hinted that Alcatel, Cisco Systems Inc., Nortel Networks and Lucent Technologies Inc. were eyeing the company ( Druce, May 2002 ). In add-on, two U.S. class-action jurisprudence houses filed cases on behalf of Marconi’s investors in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for â€Å"materially false and misleading† statements about the company ‘s growing chances. Marconi besides faced problem with its brotherhoods. â€Å" Our members are angry that their occupations have been put in hazard by a failed direction scheme, † said Roger Lyons, general secretary of the Manufacturing Science Finance brotherhood. ( Omatseye, 2001 ) However, in the physique up to the 2001 net income warning, even as they could see Marconi was immersing into the abysm, its foremans kept quiet. They paid the monetary value for this at the one-year general meeting at London ‘s Queen Elizabeth Conference Centre in July, where some stockholders clearly had trouble believing they were acquiring the full narrative from the dais, where the company ‘s managers stood ( Druce, September 2002 ). It now emerged that the stockholders were so left in the dark ; but they were non the lone 1s, as some of the most of import members of the board of the company claimed that they had non been told the full inside informations, and that the president, Sir Roger Hurn, and the main executive, by so Lord Simpson, had claimed that the company was merely in a impermanent blip ( Omatseye, 2001 ). With telecoms companies looking weaker by the twenty-four hours, it was difficult to see where Marconi ‘s optimism came from, but right up to an d through the bitter one-year general meeting, Simpson and Hurn insisted they believed the universe would better, and shortly. They besides refused to permit composing down the value of Marconi’s acquisitions in America, despite the fact that its American equals had all written down their acquisitions and the value of telecoms companies had plummeted ( Druce, May 2002 ). Even the ?1 billion of extra stock Marconi had collected was deemed to be deserving every bit much as of all time. â€Å"Our position is that we will devour that extra stock as we go through this twelvemonth, † Simpson told a doubting stockholder at the one-year meeting. When the stockholder asked what would go on if the telecoms market was to take another honkytonk, Simpson replied: â€Å"What I can state is we have taken fast and Draconian action. We should be able to prolong any sensible development in gross revenues levels.† ( Druce, May 2002 ) Stockholders at the one-year meeting were openly doubting and up on the dais Marconi ‘s managers looked clearly uncomfortable. There were marks, excessively, that the relationship between Hurn and Simpson had started to come unstuck. Harmonizing to at least two beginnings, Hurn discovered shortly after the July net incomes warning that large institutional stockholders were non placated by the fire of Mayo, that they believed Marconi’s autumn from grace required more extremist action than merely ditching the finance manager, and that Simpson knew small about telecoms ( The Economist, 2001 ) Harmonizing to these beginnings, Hurn raised the issue with Simpson, proposing that possibly he should go before the calls became louder. Simpson responded by seeking the backup of the remainder of the board. He received it, but the one time close relationship between the two work forces was damaged, and this may hold contributed to both work forces being fired at the Monday meeting, as the angry managers took their retaliation ( The Economist, 2001 ). Immediately following the meeting, the disclosures of the losingss made meant that the company, loaded down by immense debts from its acquisitions, was fighting to stay adrift. Those close to GEC in its old pretense were outraged at the devastation that has been wrought. Roy Gardner, the Centrica main executive, was a former GEC board member: â€Å"What happened at Marconi could non hold happened under the old GEC direction, † he said. â€Å"Either they changed the control environment or they ignored what they were told.† ( Omatseye, 2001 ) Derek Bonham, the former Hanson executive who joined the board in April 2001, took over as president, with the greatest reluctance because, as president of Cadbury and deputy president of Gallaher, the baccy company, he had plentifulness to busy his clip, and knew that the jobs with Marconi were likely to acquire worse ( The Economist, 2001 ). Indeed, it was reported that, after the company’s first net incomes warning in July, he was asked by Hurn, so president, if he would take on the function, and declined ( Druce, May 2002 ). However, by the clip of the general meeting, Bonham knew he would hold to rethink, and over the weekend he discussed the chance with his married woman. The information handed out to non-executive managers in front of the meeting showed that Hurn and Simpson had been hopelessly optimistic in their July estimations of how the company would do. Its debts had spiralled, its losingss had climbed to 227m in the three months to June 30, the first one-fourth of Marconi’s fiscal twelvemonth, trading remained desperate and another 2,000 occupations would hold to travel ( Omatseye, 2001 ). Bonham could non see how Simpson and Hurn could avoid fall ining the casualty list, and so agreed to take on the function. Whilst Simpson and Hurn did non set up a battle to remain on the board, it would be incorrect to propose their going was anyplace near amicable. Thousands of Marconi workers, and 1000s more former Marconi workers, felt severely let down by their direction squad, and the disillusion extended right up to the council chamber ( The Economist, 2001 ). If Hurn and Simpson had hoped to salve their reputes by remaining on after the July net incomes warning and doing John Mayo, the finance manager fired at the clip of the net income warning, a whipping boy, the gambit backfired severely. Shortly after stepping down, Hurn made it cognize that he will non be seeking a pay-off, and Bonham made it kick he expected Simpson to hold to similar footings. However, whilst Simpson and Hurn could retire to cream their lesions, and avoid the muss they created, the remains of the Marconi direction squad was forced to seek and salve what remained of the house from bankruptcy, and Michael Parton, caput of the Communications Networks Division, was moved up to the main executive’s office. Unlike Simpson, whose background was in technology, Parto n was good versed in Marconi ‘s nucleus concerns. However, until the crisis, few analysts had thought him chief-executive stuff, with Mayo due to take over from Simpson before the company started falling apart ( Druce, May 2002 ). Indeed, as Bonham expected, the jobs were far from over, as Marconi’s Bankss were shocked by the three month trading statement, and by the intelligence that debts had risen by more than ?1 billion since the twelvemonth terminal to make 4.4